Something truly disturbing happened this week at the nation’s highest court. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden appointee and poster child for the dangerous Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) agenda, decided to compare Black Americans to disabled people—all in the name of voting rights. No, seriously. She actually said it.
During oral arguments in a Supreme Court case involving congressional redistricting, Justice Jackson claimed that without the ability to create majority-Black voting districts, Black Americans are essentially “disabled” in the political system. Her exact words? “They don’t have equal access to the voting system. They’re disabled.”
Let that sink in. A sitting Supreme Court Justice just labeled an entire race of Americans as politically disabled. What’s next, race-based ramps to the ballot box?
This is the same Justice who, during her confirmation, couldn’t define what a woman is. But now she wants us to “trust her” when she insists that plaintiffs aren’t asking for another race-based district—despite the Solicitor General plainly stating, “The plaintiffs said they want another majority black district.” Jackson snapped back, “No it’s not! Trust me on this!”
Trust her? Based on what? Her track record of confused logic and woke buzzwords? This is what happens when we prioritize DEI over merit. Jackson’s performance wasn’t just embarrassing—it was dangerous. Her arguments were incoherent, her comparisons offensive, and her grasp of basic constitutional principles questionable at best.
Let’s get real here. In the last election, more minority voters cast ballots than ever before. Black Americans aren’t suffering from a lack of access to the vote—they’re participating at historic levels. So why the push to carve out racially gerrymandered districts? Because the left doesn’t want equality. They want control by division. They want to label, separate, and manipulate people into political silos.
One Twitter user put it perfectly: “I’ve never quite understood why black people being 60 percent of one district is more, or better representation than being 20 percent in 3 districts.” Exactly. Diluting influence across multiple districts can actually lead to *more* political power, not less. But the modern left prefers guaranteed outcomes over genuine representation.
Another user wrote, “This woman can’t tell what a woman is without a biologist, but just diagnosed an entire race as disabled.” That about sums it up. The left has replaced reason with ideology, and Jackson is their loudest cheerleader on the bench.
This is the tragic result of years of race-based hiring, DEI quotas, and identity politics. We are witnessing the consequences of putting activism over ability. And make no mistake, Justice Jackson isn’t just confused—she’s dangerous. She’s injecting race into every legal question, twisting logic to support leftist narratives, and undermining the very foundation of equal justice under law.
Thankfully, President Trump’s appointments to the Court are bringing balance and clarity. Young conservative justices are standing firm against this madness. They understand what the Constitution says and what it means: that *all* men and women are created equal—not categorized, divided, or disabled based on skin color.
Thomas Jefferson said it. Martin Luther King Jr. said it. And America still believes it. It’s only the radical left that’s forgotten it.
We don’t need more racial division in our voting system. We need more unity, more common sense, and more justices who actually understand the law.