Imagine what a boost this would be for President Donald Trump’s second term in office. What if we emerged from the 2026 midterm elections and the GOP had a roughly 240-190 majority in the House of Representatives? That could become a reality, based on a landmark Supreme Court case that is happening this month. Because of an anti-white racist redistricting policy embedded in the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Democrats currently have 19 more House seats than they should. Thanks to President Trump appointing a 6-3 majority on the court, forced racial gerrymandering in red states could finally be eliminated!
The case is Louisiana v. Callais, and it’s set for a re-argument in front of the court next Wednesday, October 15. Louisiana overhauled its congressional map after the 2020 census. Under the redrawn map, Louisiana only had one Democrat-controlled, majority-black district.
Democrats sued the state, arguing that this was racist and that Louisiana should have more black congressional districts. (Ironically, this was the Democrat Party’s fault because they rigged the 2020 census to favor states with huge numbers of illegal aliens.)
A federal court ruled that Louisiana had violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Those wily Republicans had used magical racism vapors to dilute minority votes in their state, according to the court. In response to that ruling, Louisiana lawmakers gerrymandered their red-state map to create a second Democrat-controlled, majority black congressional district. The new map gave Democrats +1 additional seat in Congress in the 2024 midterms.
However, voters sued, stating that the new map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. They argue that race cannot be the predominant factor in drawing congressional district lines. That makes sense, doesn’t it? States aren’t allowed to draw congressional district maps based on the number of white voters in an area, so why should it be any different for black or Hispanic voters?
The Supreme Court first heard arguments in this case back in March, but took the unusual step of asking the parties to re-argue it this month. The court asked both parties to address whether Section 2’s race-conscious remedies are themselves unconstitutional.
It’s difficult to understate just how much Democrat Party lawyers are pooping their pants over this case right now. It’s like Joe Biden visiting the Pope the day after Taco Tuesday.
If the court rules that race-conscious district map-making is unconstitutional, it could invalidate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act entirely. If that happens, red states that have been forced to create racial minority voting districts would be ordered to redraw their maps.
Alabama, Mississippi, and South Carolina would no longer have any racially mandated seats for Democrats. They would be entirely, 100% red states. Georgia, Texas, Florida, and Louisiana would also gain Republican seats.
Rep. James Clyburn is Barack Obama’s voter fraud hatchet man in Congress. Clyburn is affiliated with the African Methodist Episcopal (AME) church, which has branches in swing states across the country. If you went to any swing district in any swing state in America in 2020, AME church members were the ones counting the votes in the fake and stolen election that year.
Clyburn will lose his seat in Congress if the Supreme Court rules that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.
Rep. Sanford Bishop in Georgia would lose his House seat. So would the Russia collusion hoaxer and co-chair of the Liz Cheney January 6 Committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi. Henry Cuellar, Vicente Gonzalez, and Greg Casar would lose their seats in Texas.
Remember Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz? She’s Hillary Clinton’s buddy in District 25 in Florida. Wasserman Schultz was the head of the DNC when they rigged the 2016 Democrat primaries to steal the race from Bernie Sanders and give it to Hillary. Wasserman Schultz also spent DNC money along with Hillary’s campaign funds to pay Fusion GPS to create the fictitious Russian potty dossier.
Wasserman Schultz is at risk of losing her seat in Florida if the Supreme Court nukes Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
The Supreme Court is already leaning heavily toward doing just that. Democrats could lose 19 seats in the 2026 election, and Republicans would gain 19. Racist gerrymandering to boost Democrat representation in Congress would be a thing of the past.
Thank you, President Trump!