Is it any surprise at all that the Jeff Bezos owned Washington Post, was once tied up in the Watergate scandal, which nixed President Nixon from the Oval Office.
During the 1960s and 1970s, the CIA were actively working to get President Nixon out of the White House, citing that Nixon posed a threat to national security and military budgets and power.
Nixon had worked with the Soviet Union and facilitated the opening up to China. The CIA did not like this at all. The possibility of assassination was off the table due to the heat it would bring after John F Kennedy had been murdered in Dallas, Texas.
The Washington Post, working alongside the CIA, hatched a plan to instead politically assassinate President Nixon.
The news media, as you undoubtedly already know, are nothing but shills for the deep state. The Washington Post in particular, has talent for being the top of the heap in fake news.
One only has to look at the obviously biased coverage of former President Donald Trump, which was far more negative than good, despite the fact Trump did more than any other president in history, bar George Washington, to strengthen America against its enemies that seek to supplant it.
The media has whipped the world into a frenzy over covid-19, the lab released virus, who’s “cure” is far worse than the disease. Don’t ask for honest coverage on that, it’s simply not on the table for outlets like WaPo.
The Washington Post has also been caught up with “fact checking” for social media platforms. Labeling everything that goes against the narrative as “misinformation.”
It’s hilarious that WaPo’s mission statement is “democracy dies in darkness,” while the statement is accurate, it’s not something that is practiced at all by the Washington Post.
For instance, WaPo reported that Fox News’ Tucker Carlson was inaccurate, when he said that Ukraine was not a democracy.
“You can’t say it enough, Ukraine is not a democracy. … In American terms, you would call Ukraine a tyranny.” Carlson said.
“Ukraine, to be technical, is not a democracy,” Carlson said. “Democracies don’t arrest political opponents, and they don’t shut down opposition media, both of which Ukraine has done. And by the way, Ukraine is a pure client state of the United States State Department — again, that’s fine. We are not mad about that, go ahead and run Ukraine if you want, if you think you can do a better job than Ukrainians. Just don’t tell us it’s a democracy.”
WaPo went on to give examples of how, in fact, Ukraine has “many aspects of a democracy” and that Carlson is wrong because he met with Hungarian President Viktor Orbán, who, in their opinion, isn’t any better than Ukraine’s Zelensky.
The Washington Post, then listed “the facts.”
“In April 2019 Volodymyr Zelensky was elected president in an election considered free and fair by international and domestic observers,” the State Department said in its 2021 Human Rights report. “In July 2019 the country held early parliamentary elections that observers also considered free and fair.”
Free and fair election. We all know how true that is.
They then go on to say that while Ukraine has a constitution, allegedly allowing peaceful assembly, there isn’t actually a law that protects that right. Proving that while on the surface it appears to support rights, in practice, the reality is quite different.
WaPo then goes on to say that previous Ukrainian governments have only ever been half hearted in their approaches to democracy, leaning more towards their Russian heritage, rather than the western “example.”
It also gets noted that Ukrainian President Zelensky did indeed imprison his political opponent, Petro Poroshenko, after Zelensky allegedly beat him in a “landslide” in 2019.
Apparently Poroshenko is being charged with treason and supporting terrorism – accused of facilitating coal purchases from mines under the control of the Russians in Eastern Ukraine.
Poroshenko says the charges against him are politically motivated.
So what exactly did Carlson say that wasn’t true? Which part deserved a “fact check.” Because WaPo agreed with pretty much the entire contents of what he said. This is just another example of how the media will use information, twist it and give it back to the public with a skewed view.
